|
Phoenix
Rising: At the January 2004 first-Sunday
meeting, you stated that in the upcoming year we will face many
opportunities for growth related to our physical bodies, issues
of financial security and our perspectives on fear. Can you expand
upon this and explain why this applies particularly to 2004?
Samuel: In
a linear-time construct, one thing causes another, which causes
another in a domino effect. When you move out of the perception
that time is linear and you’re able to see that time is much
more like a ball—a tennis ball, a softball, maybe a basketball
here in Kentucky—with many, many currents that show themselves
up over and over, then you can see that it’s not just happening
in 2004. Now, both of those ways of looking at time work with what
I’ve said you are going to be experiencing in 2004, because
you started experiencing it at the end of 2003, which is to say
that it’s going to continue on the ball or the line simply
because it has already started. So let’s shift the “Why
can I say that’s going to happen in 2004?” to simply “This
is going to continue to happen because it has already started.”
Those particular three—physical bodies,
financial security, and fear—are happening as the result of
a set of “dominoes.” Those dominoes are the Fusion of
Masculine and Feminine energy, which then opened the door to a greater
flow of high-frequency power through the Guardianship into the Grid,
thus bringing about a change in mass consciousness.
Now, change brings what, for most people?
Resistance. Fear.
We’ll use fear for
the overall idea. Fear in a human, be it a Guardian or be it a just-awakening
human, is a response to a threat to the security system. So in all
humans, that’s immediately going to show up in the physical,
and in Guardianship it’s going to show up in the financial.
Why? Think back to what I have said about the people who work at
high frequencies: They find that financial issues are the first
things and the last things that come up.
So Fusion was followed by the inflow of huge amounts
of change energy affecting the Grid, affecting mass consciousness,
bringing about fear, showing itself up as an obsessive awareness
of the physical experience and financial control and projection
issues.
Why is the fear being manifested
so much within the Guardianship, when the Guardianship is actually
taking a part in making this process happen?
Remember that within the
Guardianship, there are those who accept their Guardianship and
serve with it—do something about it—and there are those
who choose not to do anything about it, and there are those who
don’t even know. Now, amongst that small group of those who
are awake, aware and activated, which I would love to be able to
tell you make up the majority I work with, but the fact is that’s
not so—fear is a response not to change as much as to chaos.
Now, I would tell you chaos is a good thing. Chaos is a creative
power; it is a means for abundance.
Guardians are born into
this world—and you can look into your own histories for this—Guardians
are born into this world, and they immediately notice that they
are extremely limited by this cloak they are wearing, by this costume
they have on. And they spend fifteen, twenty, thirty years figuring
out what it can do and what they can do in it. They’re spending
all of those years learning control—hopefully. That’s
a good control, not a fear control.
At the point of awakening, particularly awakening to Guardianship, it then becomes not control of the physical, but control of the spiritual self, and activation
is a final product of that.
In your lives, which have
you been working on longer, the activation of the physical body—learning
to control it—or the activation of the spiritual self, learning
how to use it? The answer is the physical. For the physical body,
chaos is fear. For the spiritual body, chaos is an open door. But
right now, thanks to Fusion, what you’re working on is balancing
those two. In the unknown, Guardians fear. Guardians don’t
fear things going on in the physical body—and I’m making
a very broad statement that really is for those Guardians that are
functioning in activation, and that’s really a small group,
so I don’t want to imply that all Guardians don’t fear
chaos, because that’s not true—but to activated Guardians,
chaos is recognized as an opportunity. However, the unknown, being
unsure of what you’ll be able to do with it, unsure of whether
the physical can hold up, unsure of . . . looking at all
of these issues, the unknown brings fear to you. You can deal with
spraining your ankle, you can deal with having a chronic disease,
you can deal with not knowing but trusting. That’s what chaos
is for. But you can’t deal with that sense of not having control
because of not knowing what’s going to happen. That is the
fear I’m talking about.
That implies a lack of
faith in yourself.
Well, doesn’t it indeed?
And not just yourself. I ended the year 2003 talking about the importance
of trust. You know that in Mexico I talked about trust quite a bit.
It’s not only trust in yourself—and in reality you’ve
had a lot more years, as I said earlier, learning how to trust yourself—it
has a whole lot more to do with trusting outside yourself, Paula
trusting David, David trusting Paula, Paula and David trusting Frank,
Frank trusting . . .
That’s level one.
Level two: Trusting the wisdom gained from experience. Level three:
Trusting the unseen.
How does that fear show
up in our lives, and how do we get over it?
It shows up, for example, as resistance,
anger, frustration and control issues. And those are exactly the
sorts of things that you are experiencing. So you can look at the
symptoms, put a label on it, see it, and do something about it.
The label is fear, but you could probably make it more specific
by looking at that particular situation, because each person is
going to have their own symptom pattern.
When I say label it, what I’m saying
is put a box around it. Usually I tell you not to put a box around
something, but this is the “name it, claim it” sort of
thing with fear that I’ve been teaching for twenty of your
years, or something like that. Name it so you can better see it.
Ask “What fear is this?” Don’t just say “That’s
fear.” Be more specific: What fear is it? That name is going
to allow you then to tap into what you can do about it, because
what you would do about the fear that your car is not running properly
and you’re going to be stuck without transportation is different
from the fear that your bank account is running very low. Even though
they’re both, bottom line, the same fear, what you would do
about each one depends upon how closely you are able to name it.
So if your bank account is running low, what do
you need to do?
Get a job. Look for ways of manifesting
money.
Will that help you right now with your car
not working?
No. And I can see how that ties into your
teaching about dealing with emotional reactions by looking back
and asking, “I’m angry. What am I afraid of? What does
that mean?”
That’s right. Explore. Go into the
background of what it is. If you recognize that you’re angry,
say, “Oh, anger, that means I’m afraid. What am I afraid
of?” rather than “What am I angry about?” Look at
the symptoms of the fear—and everybody’s is different,
although not all that different. So look at that symptom and say,
“So what’s going to happen if that is allowed to rule?
Why do I feel the need to control that?” because that’s
going to show you the fear.
Let me ask something about how fear can
show up in financial issues. Let’s say you have a partnership—personal,
business, it doesn’t matter—and each partner has a completely
different perspective on finances arising from personal fear, which
causes friction. One partner thinks that it is necessary to conserve,
to be careful not to spend money. The other one says, “I trust
the Universe; I know that whatever I need in the moment will be
there or at least come soon,” and spends a lot, perhaps money
that’s not really there. It looks like two different fears
and two different perspectives that don’t seem to work.
That’s because they are both extremes.
Neither one of them is correct, because the proper answer is a bit
of both—a balance. The first question is, how do you know if
what you’re thinking is an extreme rather than balance? And,
remember, that would usually show up as a problem only when you
have other people you are associating with who either have another
extreme or a different view. The way you handle it is not a problem
if it’s only you. It’s a problem when your path crosses
with another and free will gets involved. It’s relationships
that show you the issues. Living your life to defend your way of
doing things causes the Universal flow to stop. Having to defend
and justify is a function of fear—and a statement of incompletion.
While two people are each trying to justify their own versions,
the reality is it’s not about being right—that’s
what creates the problem—it’s about finding the blend.
Now, back to the question of how you know
that you’re at an extreme. Well, I just gave a hint.
When you have to defend your point of view.
Right the first time. Excellent.
Now, here’s the next question: Is an
extreme ever correct? Or, to say it another way: Is there ever a
time when it is correct to justify your action or belief? Two extreme
answers to that question could be, “Of course there is,”
and “Not while you live on this planet.” So what is the
answer?
Somewhere in the middle.
All right, what would be in the middle?
Rare times.
You’re going with it.
I would think when you have a spiritual understanding
that’s really clear to you.
Be careful that you don’t make “spiritual”
your weapon, your justification. The answer is, sometimes it’s
right; sometimes it’s not right. It’s not “Never!”
or “Always.” You were playing with it. Were you able to
make sense of it?
Well, there’s a difference for me when I’m
defending something and when I’m supporting a position. I may
be coming from “We have to be really conservative with our
money; we can’t spend it here,” and the other person is
saying, “We need to spend this; we need to trust the Universe
on this one.” It becomes part of a negotiation that says, “What
parts of this can we use? Where does trusting the Universe slip
into irresponsibility and where is conservative thinking fear-based?”
Good. If you make a decision to first seek what
you agree on, you’re going to change the energetic dynamics
of the situation. You remember the teaching in the early days of
merger? What is it you needed to do to make that merger happen?
You needed to look and see what’s the same. And that is true
with everything in your life with regard to relationships. In every
relationship, success is based on the amplification of what is the
same, with one small twist to it. And that small twist is, you only
want to look for what is positive and the same. It’s rather
obvious, but in reality a very hard thing to do, because your society
teaches you negativity; it teaches you that the world is unsafe,
that it’s filled with fear, that there is a lot of danger,
that pessimism keeps you safe, doesn’t it? So you want to make
sure that what you are looking for are similarities that are positive,
whole. And once you have established that “we both agree about
this and this and this,” you’ve changed the dynamics.
You have moved it from a physical issue to a spiritual one. And
I will assure you that handling things truly spiritually—not
justified spiritually, truly spiritually—attaches you back
into the greater flow.
Now, I realize that “attaching you back into
the greater flow” is a rather ambiguous statement. What I’m
trying not to say is that it guarantees you will get more money
in your life. What I’m trying to say is that it opens the door
into wholeness in all areas. Financial issues are all about how
whole you are. Of course, physical issues are, too.
Your first set of workshops for 2004 are about
using sound to help bring change into our lives and our world. How
can Guardians best use sound this year?
I’m going to move back to New Year’s
Eve of 2003. The group tone, the note, the pitch “C.”
Do you remember what I said you would be doing with that? At that
time, I was talking about everything that you were going to do.
Making physical the blessings that we had.
Yes. Which is to say then, that C does what?
It manifests.
Perfect. Sound has been a means of establishing
change in this world. It has been the means, always. This dimension
is about sound, because this dimension is about frequency slowing
down. And what is sound? Frequency; different levels of frequency.
With sound, you have learned to activate within
yourself, you have learned to establish a balance-point for change
in yourself and in your world. Now, because Guardianship energy—the
prototype for everything mass consciousness is going to do, based
on changes in the Grid—Guardianship is consciously focusing
on dying to the old and becoming not a better human, but god.
Why am I saying god rather than goddess or Source?
Because it implies action.
Yes. Precisely. Because what you are establishing
in the world by accepting your godhood is the highest possible frequency
of that which creates in this world. So that which is creating in
this world is made real with C. What is the first thing that is
made real? You are god. You, as god. That’s what that sound
is about; that’s where it’s going now. And I’m calling
it “the sound of love.” Why?
It’s the highest vibration in this dimension.
And I’m talking about it becoming a creative
reality, a manifesting resource.
The process is sort of feeding on itself, particularly
with the men: accepting godhood, singing C, creating themselves
as god in the process, and creating a sort of feedback loop.
It’s very exciting. Truly.
In your recent energy workings, such as at Serpent
Mound, where you had us use the tone C, you have indicated that
the men, not the women, are doing the work. There are significantly
fewer men than women in the Guardianship. How does this affect the
results of the toning work?
The first thing to remember is that I have not
added C to your toning work. C is put to use at specific workings
to bring about a particular effect. So at this point, C is not affecting
your toning at all. It doesn’t matter if there are more women
than men; it doesn’t matter that sometimes at toning there
are no men. Toning is not changed. Toning has a very specific work,
and that will continue to be needed, and it won’t change.
At these special workings, does the fact that
there are fewer men than women change the dynamics of it for you?
Do you have to make adjustments for that?
It depends on who the men are. It depends on who
the women are. It depends on how much god-ness is being expressed.
You may remember that I have said that if there are at least three
functioning as god in a group, it would change the dynamics enough
to give it a positive function. When I am doing a working—or
you are doing a working that I have asked you to do; for example,
you go the temple of Quetzalcoátl and, with this focus, do
the work—I cannot use C if there are not at least three functioning
gods there. Does that mean that those gods must be men, or can it
be men and women, or even just women? That’s answered in two
ways. The first one is: it doesn’t matter, as long as they
are functioning as god. But, here is the second one: The power of
the work comes through gender-specific men, not masculine energy,
which has fused. So if there is a physical-world change, rather
than a spiritual change—you want to bring healing to the tree
outside your door that is having trouble: physical world—you
need men. If you are bringing healing to the planet as a whole,
you need at least three gods.
Now, how do you know if you’ve got three
gods? Well, the best way of being sure is to have a whole bunch
of men, and then, one with one with one, you can have at least three
that are tuned in at any one time.
How similar will the work in Scotland and England
be to the Heart Portal work we have done in the past, when we were
matching the frequency of a site through sound?
It’s a whole lot like doing Heart-Portal
work, but opposite. You’re not matching the tone; the site
is going to match you, because what you are going to be doing is
re-awakening, precisely like Serpent Mound. You are going to be
awakening what has been waiting.
One aspect of sound that we sometimes forget is
speech—the words we choose to use, our tone and inflection.
What can you tell us about the power of sound in speech, as opposed
to the communication itself?
The more you are able to harness your personal
power, the more flexible your vocalizations are. That’s a very
bottom-line, broad statement. You know of people who just speak
in a more or less nasal, flat monotone. They are not accessing their
personal power, whereas those whose voices contain feelings are
accessing it. Now again, that’s very broad, but that’s
what your physical ability to craft sound is an expression of.
So, what does that mean if you choose to shout
at somebody in anger, as opposed to not raising your voice or not
putting that much emotion into it?
You’re accessing your power, but unfortunately,
you are misappropriating it. You are using it inappropriately.
So basically you’re saying the communication
is the key issue, not the actual tone or use of speech.
Communication and relationships are the means
by which everything that has to do with your Guardianship is going
to get worked through. So communication involves the way you use
words, whereas sound has to do with the way you use your vocal apparatus,
and that’s different.
Please click here to go
to the Winter, ‘04 interview.
|
